Artesia Water Ad

Sure reads like Dick was fired

Artesia now in hands of 2 women

Author: Lesli Hicks Express-News Business Writer  
Publish Date: November 26, 1994

Three months ago, two women quietly took the helm of Alamo City Beverage Inc., also known as Artesia Waters Inc.

They assumed the top roles in a relatively young industry widely viewed as male-dominated.

But their presence as women running a high-profile company also is rare for San Antonio.

Margaret Shodrock is chief executive officer and co-owner of Artesia.
The other owner, Cheryl Randol, is president.

***
ArtesiaWaters Inc.  Sold to an employee, MARGARET K. SHODROCK, and two outside investors: 

San Antonio Business Journal: Friday, November 25, 1994:


The "financial backer of firm-founder Rick Scoville" sold ArtesiaWaters Inc. to an employee, MARGARET K. SHODROCK, and two outside investors:

Artesia: New owners, focus

Artesia Waters Inc., Texas' oldest bottler of mineral water, has quietly changed hands.
...
...Shodrock says the deal was "very attractive." The Business Journal was unable to reach Scoville before press time or find out the name of Scoville's backer.

The firm's new owners have also changed Artesia's name to Alamo City Beverage Inc., but will continue to offer products under the Artesia name.

Alamo City Beverage currently has a work force of 18 people, but employs more during its peak seasons during the summer. It operates at a 37,000-square-foot bottling plant at 4671 Walzem Road. The company purifies and bottles water from the Edwards Aquifer.

Shodrock has been employed by Artesia for seven years, serving in positions ranging from corporate comptroller to operations manager.

The firm's new president, Cheryl K. Randol, formerly maintained a local dental practice, served in a teaching position at the University of Texas Health Science Center and as a senior vice president at Texas Dental Plans Inc. Randol and her husband are now co-owners of Alamo
City Beverage.
...
The company has replaced its old trademark brown glass bottles with plastic.
...
According to Shodrock, the company under Scoville suffered declining market share because of its emphasis on carbonated and flavored water.

"It was a management decision." Shodrock says. "(Carbonated water) was the emphasis that (Scoville) wanted." Scoville is no longer with the company.

Scoville, a former industrial glue salesman, launched the company in 1980, taking on France's Perrier, the dominant brand of bottled waterat the time.

Scoville, an aggressive pitch man for his products, took the company through a series of ups and downs during his tenure as CEO. During the late 1980s, Artesia outsold Perrier's name-brand carbonated water in Texas.

But, the firm also felt a slap when the Wall Street Journal ran an article claiming the company misled consumers about the source of its product. The company filed a $ 10 million libel suit against the publication, but a federal jury found the story not to be libelous.

During the trial, testimony pointed out that the firm's earnings decreased from 1989 to 1991, according to media reports.

In better times--1985--Scoville turned down a buyout offer from brewing giant Anheuser-Busch.

Sure reads like Dick was fired

Artesia now in hands of 2 women

Author: Lesli Hicks Express-News Business Writer  
Publish Date: November 26, 1994

Three months ago, two women quietly took the helm of Alamo City Beverage Inc., also known as Artesia Waters Inc.

They assumed the top roles in a relatively young industry widely viewed as male-dominated.

But their presence as women running a high-profile company also is rare for San Antonio.

Margaret Shodrock is chief executive officer and co-owner of Artesia.
The other owner, Cheryl Randol, is president.

***

San Antonio Business Journal: Friday, November 25, 1994:

The "financial backer of firm-founder Rick Scoville" sold ArtesiaWaters Inc. to an employee, MARGARET K. SHODROCK, and two outside investors:

Artesia: New owners, focus

Artesia Waters Inc., Texas' oldest bottler of mineral water, has quietly changed hands.
...
...Shodrock says the deal was "very attractive." The Business Journal was unable to reach Scoville before press time or find out the name of Scoville's backer.

The firm's new owners have also changed Artesia's name to Alamo City Beverage Inc., but will continue to offer products under the Artesia name.

Alamo City Beverage currently has a work force of 18 people, but employs more during its peak seasons during the summer. It operates at a 37,000-square-foot bottling plant at 4671 Walzem Road. The company purifies and bottles water from the Edwards Aquifer.

Shodrock has been employed by Artesia for seven years, serving in positions ranging from corporate comptroller to operations manager.

The firm's new president, Cheryl K. Randol, formerly maintained a local dental practice, served in a teaching position at the University of Texas Health Science Center and as a senior vice president at Texas Dental Plans Inc. Randol and her husband are now co-owners of Alamo
City Beverage.
...
The company has replaced its old trademark brown glass bottles with plastic.
...
According to Shodrock, the company under Scoville suffered declining market share because of its emphasis on carbonated and flavored water.

"It was a management decision." Shodrock says. "(Carbonated water) was the emphasis that (Scoville) wanted." Scoville is no longer with the company.

Scoville, a former industrial glue salesman, launched the company in 1980, taking on France's Perrier, the dominant brand of bottled waterat the time.

Scoville, an aggressive pitch man for his products, took the company through a series of ups and downs during his tenure as CEO. During the late 1980s, Artesia outsold Perrier's name-brand carbonated water in Texas.

But, the firm also felt a slap when the Wall Street Journal ran an article claiming the company misled consumers about the source of its product. The company filed a $ 10 million libel suit against the publication, but a federal jury found the story not to be libelous.

During the trial, testimony pointed out that the firm's earnings decreased from 1989 to 1991, according to media reports.

In better times--1985--Scoville turned down a buyout offer from brewing giant Anheuser-Busch.

Sure reads like Dick was fired

Artesia now in hands of 2 women

Author: Lesli Hicks Express-News Business Writer  
Publish Date: November 26, 1994

Three months ago, two women quietly took the helm of Alamo City Beverage Inc., also known as Artesia Waters Inc.

They assumed the top roles in a relatively young industry widely viewed as male-dominated.

But their presence as women running a high-profile company also is rare for San Antonio.

Margaret Shodrock is chief executive officer and co-owner of Artesia.
The other owner, Cheryl Randol, is president.

***

San Antonio Business Journal: Friday, November 25, 1994:

The "financial backer of firm-founder Rick Scoville" sold ArtesiaWaters Inc. to an employee, MARGARET K. SHODROCK, and two outside investors:

Artesia: New owners, focus

Artesia Waters Inc., Texas' oldest bottler of mineral water, has quietly changed hands.
...
...Shodrock says the deal was "very attractive." The Business Journal was unable to reach Scoville before press time or find out the name of Scoville's backer.

The firm's new owners have also changed Artesia's name to Alamo City Beverage Inc., but will continue to offer products under the Artesia name.

Alamo City Beverage currently has a work force of 18 people, but employs more during its peak seasons during the summer. It operates at a 37,000-square-foot bottling plant at 4671 Walzem Road. The company purifies and bottles water from the Edwards Aquifer.

Shodrock has been employed by Artesia for seven years, serving in positions ranging from corporate comptroller to operations manager.

The firm's new president, Cheryl K. Randol, formerly maintained a local dental practice, served in a teaching position at the University of Texas Health Science Center and as a senior vice president at Texas Dental Plans Inc. Randol and her husband are now co-owners of Alamo
City Beverage.
...
The company has replaced its old trademark brown glass bottles with plastic.
...
According to Shodrock, the company under Scoville suffered declining market share because of its emphasis on carbonated and flavored water.

"It was a management decision." Shodrock says. "(Carbonated water) was the emphasis that (Scoville) wanted." Scoville is no longer with the company.

Scoville, a former industrial glue salesman, launched the company in 1980, taking on France's Perrier, the dominant brand of bottled waterat the time.

Scoville, an aggressive pitch man for his products, took the company through a series of ups and downs during his tenure as CEO. During the late 1980s, Artesia outsold Perrier's name-brand carbonated water in Texas.

But, the firm also felt a slap when the Wall Street Journal ran an article claiming the company misled consumers about the source of its product. The company filed a $ 10 million libel suit against the publication, but a federal jury found the story not to be libelous.

During the trial, testimony pointed out that the firm's earnings decreased from 1989 to 1991, according to media reports.

In better times--1985--Scoville turned down a buyout offer from brewing giant Anheuser-Busch.

FDA Finds Bunk in Bottled-Water Claims

 FDA Finds Bunk in Bottled-Water Claims
________________________________________________________________________
An FDA investigation into the bottled-water industry suggests that the water of a number of domestic companies may not be as pure and natural as consumers have been led to believe. Among those companies with questionably pure waters are Lithia Springs Water Co and Artesia Waters Inc.

Lithia Springs Water Co. of Georgia touts its "world's finest" bottled mineral water as "naturally pure" and recommends downing a glass of its special Love Water as an "invigorator" before bed time. Artesia Waters Inc. promotes its water as "100% pure sparkling Texas Natural Water."

But a new Food and Drug Administration survey of the U.S. bottled-water industry suggests that the water of a number of domestic companies may not be as pure and natural as consumers have been led to believe. Artesia Waters, for example, doesn't mention that its water, a favorite at the Bush White House, is heavily processed and comes from the same underground source that San Antonio taps for its municipal water supply. And 31% of the brands surveyed, including Lithia Springs water, were found to be tainted with bacteria.

The FDA findings will be made public today at a House hearing that could be the biggest threat to the $2 billion industry's image since the global Perrier recall in February 1990. At the same time, the House Energy and Commerce subcommittee will issue a report charging that the marketing hype of some bottlers misleads consumers into thinking their products are superior to tap water. "This is an industry that often relies on obfuscation and sleight of hand to market and sell a fundamental commodity to an unwitting public," asserts Democratic Rep. John Dingell of Michigan, the subcommittee's chairman.

The industry has been bracing for the political assault as if its Waterloo were at hand. "Our water is well regulated and safe for consumption," says Tyrone Wilson, spokesman for the International Bottled Water Association. "There have been no reported cases of people getting sick from drinking bottled water in the U.S." He says the trade group, based in Alexandria, Va., discourages any misleading or false claims by its members.

The international industry was jolted early last year when Source Perrier S.A., Paris, was forced to recall its trademark mineral water after U.S. health authorities found it contained traces of benzene, a suspected carcinogen. After resuming production, Perrier subsequently agreed under pressure from the FDA and the European Community to stop labeling its water "naturally carbonated" because the company adds gas to the water from its spring in southern France.

Subcommittee staff members, who have been studying the U.S. industry for more than a year, found a confusing array of bottled water labels claiming unique sources and properties. Bottled water can be "artesian," "glacial," "purified," "naturally carbonated," and "accompanied with a twist" of some fruit. The terms, while promoting the notion of bottled water's superiority, are usually unsubstantiated, according to the staff's report.

One critic, Irina Cech, a professor of environmental health and hydrology at University of Texas, Houston, complains that the artwork on the many labels can be particularly misleading. She cites three Texas brands bearing pictures of a mountain stream or a waterfall or a moon-lit lake that suggest the water comes from far-off natural sources. Only by reading the small print would consumers know that all three relied on Houston's municipal system for their water.

"The artwork is pretty; it's attractive, but it doesn't tell me anything," says Ms. Cech. "They should cut out the catchy phrases and tell us the facts. We don't know what the chemical composition is, when it was bottled, who inspected it or how it was treated."

Sodium labeling is another problem identified by the staff. Consumers on severely restricted sodium diets could easily exceed their maximum daily allowance by drinking bottled water labeled "low sodium."

One company likely to be singled out at today's hearing is Artesia Waters, a major bottler based in San Antonio, Texas. The company promotes its "naturally healthy" water as a "perfect replacement" for spring or municipal water. But the staff investigators found that Artesia and the city of San Antonio draw their water from the Edwards Aquifer, and that the main difference between them is the type and extent of processing. "We do as little processing as we can -- only what's required by our state health department," says Richard Scoville, Artesia's founder and president.

Lithia Springs Water Co. "exemplifies everything that is wrong in the industry," contends Rep. Dingell. "Not only does the producer make unsubstantiated health claims, but also markets the same water with different names at substantially different prices."

What's more, he says, its water was found last fall to be highly contaminated with bacteria. One sample contained 3.3 million organisms per milliliter of water, including 13,000 Pseudomonas aeruginosa bacteria, which some experts regard as a threat to infants and chronically ill patients. "That's incredible," says Fred Rosenberg, a microbiologist at Northeastern University, Boston. "The worst we ever saw in our lab was up around 250,000 {organisms} per milliliter in a sample of European water."

Gleda James, Lithia Springs owner, says the tainted water has been recalled and the contamination problem corrected. As for health claims, she denies making any for her company's water, which was used by a 19th-century health spa in Lithia Springs.

The FDA's survey is likely to rock the industry. Among other things, the agency found 31% of 52 U.S. brands to be tainted with bacteria. In addition, the agency uncovered poor manufacturing practices at 29% of the domestic companies surveyed and found water testing "deviations" at 31%.

FDA officials contend that bottled water is generally safe, despite the bacteria findings. None of the samples showed any signs of fecal contamination, according to Joseph Madden, an agency microbiologist. But the Pseudomonas aeruginosa findings are particularly troubling to some experts because some water bottlers target their advertising and marketing at parents who are worried about using tap water in infant formula.

At today's hearing, the industry's image will be further stained by the release of a list of 22 bottled water recalls, because of contaminants such as kerosene and mold. Most of them, overshadowed by the Perrier recall, went unnoticed by consumers. The number represents a significant jump from the handful of recalls during the preceding two years.

At the same time, lawmakers are likely to assail the FDA for what Mr. Dingell calls regulatory "lassitude." A new audit by the General Accounting Office shows that the agency has been slow to adopt standards for several harmful contaminants, lacks a complete inventory of the nation's 500 bottlers and inspects them only once every five or six years.

In addition, the agency exempted mineral water from bottled water standards in 1973 without ever developing alternative standards, according to the audit. FDA officials say tight budgets have forced them to focus on more-pressing health concerns.

The hearing will thrust the International Bottled Water Association into a particularly difficult dilemma. On one hand, the group claims self-regulation has been working; on the other, it has been calling for more comprehensive federal regulation to keep up with the industry's fivefold jump in sales over the last decade.

Thomas Pirko, a beverage industry consultant in Los Angeles, believes fallout from hearing testimony could damp the industry's growth rate: "The public could get wind of the fact that this industry is a lot of hype and fluff."

Credit: Staff Reporter of The Wall Street Journal

Richard M. Scoville: STALKER

knock, knock.

Found ya.

 

Here is Uncle Ricky aka Richard Morton Scoville.

Bottled vs. Tap Water

This explains a lot about Scoville and his business "acumen".

From a posting on USENET by Spamtrap@spamcop.net:

Artifacts follow:
(1) Richard Morton Scoville was described in a Friday, November 16,
1990 San Antonio Business Journal article ("Artesia Water Loses
Moneyin Judicial Victory") as the "owner" of ArtesiaWaters.

In that article, "Rick Scoville" was described as having brought suit
in February 1987 against a glass bottle manufacturer in Mexico and
winning, in December 1989, a substantial judgment in a jury trial:
$ 28,060 actual damages
$ 2,000,000 exemplary damages
$ 136,000 attorney's fees

However, in May of 1990, a judge reduced the award to actual damages
only. Per the article:

"My greatest fears had become a reality -- that a judge, not a jury of
my peers, would tender a verdict which was predicated by something
other than right versus wrong," says company president Scoville. Judge
Whittington was unavailable for comment. But jury foreman Darla Allen,
who LEARNED OF THE CHANGE IN THE AWARD THROUGH LETTERS FROM SCOVILLE,
says she is disillusioned about the system.
...
Scoville was FINED FOR CONTEMPT OF COURT DURING THE TRIAL and fined $
500 when he protested to the judge against an ACCUSATION BY THE
DEFENSE THAT HE WAS BOTTLING TAP WATER. ... "We almost did go out of
business because of this," Scoville says.

(2) On Wednesday, April 10, 1991, the Wall Street Journal published an
article with this title:

FDA FINDS BUNK IN BOTTLEDWATER CLAIMS

In summary, the article stated:

Food and Drug Administration survey of US bottled-water industry
suggests that water of number of domestic companies may not be as pure
and natural as consumers have been led to believe; ArtesiaWaters ...
is heavily processed and COMES FROM THE SAME UNDERGROUND SOURCE THAT
SANANTONIO TAPS FOR ITS MUNICIPAL WATER SUPPLY...

(3) This article was followed by more public discourse regarding
bottlers and their claims, including specific discussion regarding
Richard Morton Scoville's company, Artesia Waters. As noted in
theMonday, April 15, 1991 article in 'Adweek Marketing
Week' (BRANDWEEK):

Water Brands Face New Scrutiny

Last week the $ 2.6 billion category won more unfavorable publicity as
Rep. John D. Dingell (D-Mich.) conducted hearings on the industry.

In testimony, the FDA revealed a bit of common industry knowledge --
that bottledwater sources are often the same ones used by
municipalcities. For the White House's favorite water brand, Artesia,
Artesia Waters Inc. USES THE SAME ACQUIFIER AS THE CITY OF SAN
ANTONIO, TEXAS
...
I think if I lived in San Antonio," ... "I'd feel a little cheated."

(4) In a Monday, July 10, 1991 article in the "Marketing News",
Scoville announced his plans to sue the Wall Street Journal, and a
professor who was a source for the WSJ's article, and
"possiblelitigation against [U.S. Representative John D.] Dingell".

Bottled-water firm set to sue over charges

ArtesiaWaters Inc., San Antonio, Texas, which is threatening legal
action, said it watched sales plummet 45% in May, a month after a
General Accounting Office report, ...
The charges that Artesia is the same quality as San Antonio's tap
water are "totally ludicrous," Scoville said. ...
But Scoville said it was the The Wall Street Journal's preview of the
House hearings, which included allegations against Artesia, that had
the "most damaging marketing effect."
...
the company is putting together a "major, major lawsuit" against the
Journal and one of the story's sources, ... a professor of
environmental health and hydrology at University of Texas at
Houston. ...

The congressional hearing "stirred up some unnecessary controversy"
but "I really don't think it hurt the industry," said Hellen Berry,
vice president of marketing at Beverage Marketing Corp., New York.
Consumers were skeptical about bottled water but that lasted "no more
than a week." ... Artesia was one of the few brands "actively
affected" and it has "already starting making its explanations." Berry
said other bottled water marketers "would be well advised to ignore
[the controversy] totally."

(5) According to a Friday, August 14, 1992 article in the San Antonio
Business Journal, Scoville and ArtesiaWaters filed yet another
lawsuit, this time in July against another bottle supplier, claiming
"2 millionin sales ... and $ 5 million a year in potential sales".

Artesia, Bottle Supplier Negotiating to Settle Legal Dispute

Artesia's petition alleges that [Vidriera Oriental, S.A. de C.V.
(VOSA) of Mexico] misrepresented its ability to produce bottles before
entering into its contract, violating the Texas Deceptive Trade
Practices Act. Under the act, Artesia should be able to recoup its
attorneys fees from the defendant in addition to three times its
actual damages, according to the suit. ...
The suit is not the first Artesia has filed against a Mexican bottle
company. ...

In that suit, a Dallas County judge pitched out a jury's decision
togrant Artesia $ 2 million in punitive damages and legal fees,
instead awarding the company $ 28,060 in damages from the lengthy
case. The judge's decision cost Artesia $ 150,000 in legal fees that
it would have partially recouped if the jury's decision had been
allowed tostand.

Within six months of the decision, Artesia appealed the suit and came
to an out-of court settlement with Vitro, Scoville says. He would
notreveal the amount of the settlement.

(6) In a Monday, January 25, 1993 article, the "Legal Intelligencer"
announced the jury's verdict AGAINST Scoville and ArtesiaWaters in
theWSJ lawsuit:

JURY: ARTESIA WATERS WAS NOT LIBELED

A federal court jury ruled Thursday that ArtesiaWaters, Inc., was not
libeled by a story in the Wall Street Journal that said the
companymisled consumers about the source of its product.

Artesia President Rick Scoville said he planned to appeal,...

Both Scoville and his attorney, George Shaffer, said they won a moral
victory because the jury did find that the company had not
distributedcontaminated water and did not have to recall any of its
products.

(7) A Monday, Frbruary 15, 1993 article in "Texas Lawyer" describes
the
verdict additionally:

ARTESIA WATERS INC. v. BRUCE INGERSOLL and THE WALL STREET JOURNAL

... Austin's George, Donaldson & Ford successfully defended The Wall
Street Journal and one of its reporters in a $10 million libel
suitfiled by San Antonio-based ArtesiaWaters Inc.

Artesia was represented by brothers George Shaffer and Robert Shaffer
& Shaffer.

U.S. Magistrate Judge John W. Primomo of San Antonio on Jan. 25
entered a take nothing judgment and dismissed the suit with prejudice.
An eight-member jury ... found Jan. 21 that statements in an article
published April 10, 1991, were not false and defamatory to Artesia.
...
The suit, filed in March 1992, alleged that the article implied that
Artesia sells city water, has had false or misleading promotions, has
bottled contaminated water and has conducted a recall. The jury found
only that the article stated or implied that Artesia sells city water
and has had false or misleading promotions. But the jury said those
statements were not false and defamatory.

(8) The case had interest in the publishing community, as noted in a
Saturday, February 20, 1993 article in "Editor & Publisher Magazine":

WSJ cleared in libel case

...
The jury found that the "article is a substantially true account of
the activities of the FDA" and a congressional committee.

Scoville claimed in the $ 10 million libel suit, filed in March 1992,
that the story damaged the company's reputation and reduced its sales.

Journal lawyer R. James George said the company misled the public by
claiming the water was "bottled at the source" and showed a waterfall
on the label. However, George said, there was no waterfall at the
source. He claimed Scoville even kept the source a "trade secret"
forsome time

(9) It is unclear if Scoville's string of unsuccessful lawsuits led to
this, but, as noted in this Friday, November 25, 1994 article in the
San Antonio Business Journal, the "financial backer of firm-founder
Rick Scoville" sold ArtesiaWaters Inc. to an employee, MARGARET K.
SHODROCK, and two outside investors:

Artesia: New owners, focus

ArtesiaWaters Inc., Texas' oldest bottler of mineral water, has
quietly changed hands.
...
...Shodrock says the deal was "very attractive." The Business Journal
was unable to reach Scoville before press time or find out the name of
Scoville's backer.

The firm's new owners have also changed Artesia's name to Alamo City
Beverage Inc., but will continue to offer products under the
Artesianame.

Alamo City Beverage currently has a work force of 18 people, but
employs more during its peak seasons during the summer. It operates at
a 37,000-square-foot bottling plant at 4671 Walzem Road. The
companypurifies and bottles water from the Edwards Aquifer.

Shodrock has been employed by Artesia for seven years, serving in
positions ranging from corporate comptroller to operations manager.

The firm's new president, Cheryl K. Randol, formerly maintained a
local dental practice, served in a teaching position at the University
of Texas Health Science Center and as a senior vice president at Texas
Dental Plans Inc. Randol and her husband are now co-owners of Alamo
City Beverage. ...
The company has replaced its old trademark brown glass bottles with
plastic.
...
According to Shodrock, the company under Scoville suffered declining
market share because of its emphasis on carbonated and flavored water.

"It was a management decision." Shodrock says. "(Carbonated water) was
the emphasis that (Scoville) wanted." Scoville is no longer with the
company.

Scoville, a former industrial glue salesman, launched the company in
1980, taking on France's Perrier, the dominant brand of bottled
waterat the time.

Scoville, an aggressive pitch man for his products, took the company
through a series of ups and downs during his tenure as CEO. During the
late 1980s, Artesia outsold Perrier's name-brand carbonated water
inTexas.

But, the firm also felt a slap when the Wall Street Journal ran an
article claiming the company misled consumers about the source of its
product. The company filed a $ 10 million libel suit against
thepublication, but a federal jury found the story not to be
libelous.

During the trial, testimony pointed out that the firm's earnings
decreased from 1989 to 1991, according to media reports. In better
times--1985--Scoville turned down a buyout offer from brewing
giantAnheuser-Busch.

(10) An amusing footnote to the foregoing, and a preview of his
current net lunacy, is provided by this report of harassment by
Scoville ofsamspade.org:

http://static.samspade.org/flynow.html

A usenet spammer, using the name of Margaret Morice, using the email
addresses flyrite@swbell.net, mamorice@aol.com, KRic...@aol.com and a
number of flyno...@aol.com addresses is harassing both SamSpade.org
and centergate.com (the nice company that donates all of SamSpade.orgs
huge bandwidth requirements).

So far the harassment has taken the form of mailbombing, obscene
email, frivolous complaints to providers, harassing phone calls, bogus
police reports, threats of lawsuits and a number of other things.
These have gone to not only myself and the employees of Centergate and
associated companies but also to others who sit on the same commitees
as Centergate staff members. There have also been false allegations,
including what appears to be forged porn spam, sent to
businessassociates, risking significant business costs.